This version has been discontinued, but a newer version is available. You can download the newer version by visiting the downloads page. Some software requires a subscription.
SMART Notebook software uses a technology called TLS 1.0 and 1.1 to protect your data when it's sent over the internet. However, these older technologies now have some weaknesses that make it susceptible to attacks by malicious agents. To ensure your data continues to be safe while using SMART software, SMART Notebook is phasing out the use of TLS 1.0 and 1.1 and implementing new protections.
To avoid potential disruptions and stay aligned with best security practices, SMART recommends updating to SMART Notebook 23 by December 31, 2023. If you don't update by this date, you will see an error message saying, "Trial period has expired" even if you have an active SMART Notebook Plus (SMART Learning Suite) subscription.
To update to SMART Notebook
Follow the links below for complete instructions on deploying an update or using the SMART Product Updater to update SMART software.
For individual installations and updates using the SMART Product Updater, see this support topic.
For deploying updates to Windows or Mac computers: See the Updating the software chapter of the deployment guide for your operating system. To find the deployment guides, visit the Documents page.
Benefits of upgrading
Beyond ensuring your data is secure, SMART Notebook 23 also gives users several improvements that will enhance the user experience. To learn about the new features that come with the latest version, SMART Notebook 23, see the release notes.
If you’re using SMART Notebook software on a Mac computer that has been updated to macOS Mojave, you might experience issues that result from the new privacy-protection features included in the update. Read this article to help resolve issues when installing and using SMART Notebook software on a computer with macOS Mojave. If you’re using SMART Notebook for Mac and a SMART Board 4000 or E70 interactive display, read this article.
Where Jackson differs is in the imperative mood. Most reflective poems end in acceptance or melancholy. “Man in the Mirror” ends in action: “make that change.” It is a call to convert shame into behavior. The poem’s enduring power lies in its rejection of hypocrisy. It warns against the “pointing finger” (a line in the song) that identifies others’ flaws while ignoring one’s own. In an era of performative activism, the poem insists that no political sign, social media post, or charitable donation substitutes for personal transformation. The mirror becomes a device of radical honesty: you cannot heal the world if you refuse to heal yourself.
Introduction Few lyrical works have penetrated global consciousness as deeply as Michael Jackson’s 1988 hit “Man in the Mirror.” While often categorized as pop music, the song functions as a powerful piece of socially conscious poetry. Written by Glen Ballard and Siedah Garrett, and performed with raw vulnerability by Jackson, the piece transcends entertainment to become a moral treatise on personal accountability. This paper examines the song as a poem, analyzing its structural elements, rhetorical devices, and thematic message: that meaningful social change must begin not with external activism, but with the harrowing act of confronting one’s own reflection. The Central Metaphor: The Mirror as Moral Arbiter The poem’s controlling metaphor—the mirror—is its most critical element. Unlike a window that looks outward onto society’s problems (poverty, homelessness, injustice), the mirror forces an inward gaze. The “man in the mirror” represents the unvarnished self, stripped of ego and excuse. In poetic tradition, mirrors often symbolize truth or self-deception (e.g., Sylvia Plath’s “Mirror,” which declares “I am not cruel, only truthful”). Jackson’s poem adopts this tradition, but adds a urgent, almost confrontational tone: the mirror does not passively reflect; it demands action. poem man in the mirror
The bridge introduces a powerful personal confession: I’ve been a victim of a selfish kind of love It’s time that I realize Here, the poem admits past failure. The phrase “selfish kind of love” suggests narcissism or emotional cowardice. By confessing this, the speaker moves from abstract moralizing to vulnerable testimony. This shift from observation to confession is what elevates the lyric to poetry. Comparison to Traditional Reflective Poetry “Man in the Mirror” shares DNA with canonical poems of self-examination. Compare William Wordsworth’s “Tintern Abbey,” where the poet revisits a landscape to measure his own spiritual decay and growth. Both works use external observation (poverty for Jackson; nature for Wordsworth) as a catalyst for internal reckoning. Similarly, Robert Hayden’s “Those Winter Sundays” reflects on a father’s unrecognized sacrifices, ending with the famous question: “What did I know, what did I know / of love’s austere and lonely offices?” Jackson’s poem asks the same—how could I have seen suffering and done nothing? Where Jackson differs is in the imperative mood
The recurring plea—“If you wanna make the world a better place / Take a look at yourself and then make a change”—inverts the typical activist impulse. Rather than pointing fingers outward, the speaker admits complicity in the world’s suffering. This shift from blame to self-criticism is the poem’s moral fulcrum. 1. Verses as Witnessing The verses function as a series of observed injustices: I see the kids in the street / With not enough to eat A broken bottle top / And a one man’s soul These are stark, imagistic fragments—poetic snapshots of urban decay. The language is simple but evocative, avoiding abstract preaching in favor of concrete detail. The use of “a one man’s soul” suggests that collective suffering is made up of individual tragedies. The poem’s enduring power lies in its rejection
The chorus is deliberately repetitive and chant-like, mimicking the obsessive nature of moral guilt. Anaphora (the repetition of “I’m starting with”) reinforces the speaker’s commitment: I’m starting with the man in the mirror I’m asking him to change his ways The shift from third-person (“the man”) to first-person (“I’m asking him”) creates a disorienting split self—the speaker is both the observer and the observed. This internal dialogue is the essence of poetic self-reflection.